🔗 Share this article

Australia's bold policy to ban social platforms access for young people below 16 is creating waves worldwide. Officials, safety advocates, and families are monitoring with great interest to see if this strategy will become a template for other nations.

The European Movement

In Europe, a growing group of states are exploring similar restrictions.

• Denmark has announced a ban on social media for children under fifteen, with the PM arguing that smartphones and platforms are "robbing our kids' childhood". Legislation may be formalized in the coming year.
• Norway is planning to implement a access barrier of 15, citing the need to safeguard young people from the "power of the recommendation systems".
• The Irish government is introducing a online verification tool to verify the age and identity of social media users. The media minister have stated that an similar ban could be "an options under consideration".
• In Spain, the president has asked lawmakers to pass a bill raising the legal age for accessing social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has proposed a ban for those under fifteen, and a legislative committee has endorsed a comparable action, potentially involving an overnight "screen time restriction" for older teenagers.
• The administration in The Dutch government has recommended families to block their youngsters from social media up to the age of 15.

Across the European Union, the EU parliament has adopted a advisory motion calling for a ban for teenagers under 16 unless a parent decides otherwise is granted. While it cautions of the "habit-forming" design of these services, the resolution does not establish enforceable legislation.

"A strong age limit is a good starting point," stated the parliamentarian driving the measure.

The UK: A Watchful Approach

In the UK, the government has remained open to a possible ban, emphasizing that "no measure is being dismissed" but stressing any policy must be "grounded in conclusive evidence".

Previously, support built behind a bill to introduce restrictions on social media use by teenagers, but it was in the end modified. Instead, the administration pledged to conduct more studies the issue.

Campaign organizations have expressed apprehensions. One foundation set up by the family of a teenager who took her own life after encountering harmful social media material suggests that a strict age ban might not make platforms safer and could lead to a "dangerous transition" of risk when users reach the legal age.

"The Australian ban is a response to the inability of the social media companies to build platforms and apps that are safe and suitable for children," said a prominent child protection advocate.

The US: A Fragmented Picture

Across America, action is primarily occurring at the regional level against a backdrop of federal gridlock.

• Utah requires parental consent for those under 18 to use social media and restricts nighttime use.
• Florida has enacted a measure prohibiting children under fourteen from joining social media, though it is entangled in legal challenges.
• Virginia has approved a regulation limiting teenagers to one hour of social media time per day, with extra access dependent on parental permission.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have likewise enacted measures demanding guardian approval for teenagers to set up social media profiles.

Even with cross-party agreement and calls from various politicians to mimic the Australian example, a nationwide ban is right now seen as unlikely.

International Views

Apart from these regions, additional countries are likewise taking action.

• The Malaysian government aims to ban social media for teenagers beginning next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has lifted the access age for the platform Instagram to 16.

However, global agencies adopt a more measured tone. A major UN agency has cautioned that blanket prohibitions have downsides and "may even have unintended consequences". The organization points out that social networks can be a "vital connection" for isolated children and that regulation should not be a "excuse" for platform operators to improve user protection.

As this global conversation unfolds, the steps of Australia and several other countries show that governments internationally are no longer prepared to delay for the industry to make changes on their own.